English Version
| Thursday, 26 April 2018 |
Indonesia Version

Wednesday, 25 April 2018 | 22:34
Govt Urged to Anticipate Rupiah Depreciation Speaker of the House Bambang Soesatyo reminds the Ministry of
Finance and Bank Indonesia to take action to anticipate the
weakening of the rupiah against the US dollar
Wednesday, 25 April 2018 | 22:24
Schedule of Tourist Visits to Komodo Park Needed to be Managed An economic observer James Adam said that the schedule of
tourist visits to Komodo National Park needs to be managed
In Ahok's Blasphemy Case, LBH Jakarta Defends Ahok  
Sunday, 16 April, 2017 | 15:44 WIB
In Ahok's Blasphemy Case, LBH Jakarta Defends Ahok  

TEMPO.CO, Jakarta- Jakarta Legal Aid Institute (LBH) filed Amicus Curiae (a brief filed by someone who is not party to a case) in the blasphemy case against Basuki Tjahaja Purnama known as Ahok.

LBH Jakarta director Alghiffari Aqsa claimed that Ahok has fallen victim to the use of an anti-democracy article.

Alghiffari stated that the statement made by Basuki or Ahok in Pramuka island, Seribu Islands on September last year could not at all be considered as religious tafsir (interpretation).

"Ahok actually criticized a subject of law (people) or certain parties that use religious articles (Koran) to deceive the public in political activities," he said on Saturday (15/4).

Alghiffari explained that such a statement did not meet bad intent as required to be proven in line with Article 156a Criminal Code (KUHP). In this case, Ahok’s statement is protected by the freedom of speech and expression as stipulated by Article 28E of Law No.9/1998.

"It is the spread of negative interpretation in social media over Ahok’s statement that actually causes an uproar in the society," Alghiffari said.

He mentioned that there was a third party who interpreted Ahok’s statement. This third party did not even listen, witness, or directly experience the moment when the statement was uttered.



via Facebookvia TEMPO ID


Disclaimer: The views expressed in the comments sections are personal responses that do not represent the editorial policy of tempo.co. Our editorial staff reserves the right to moderate or take down comments that contain harassment, intimidation and discrimination against ethnicity, religion, race, and inter-group relations.