English Version
ENGLISH
| Thursday, 24 August 2017 |
Indonesia Version
INDONESIA
Facebook
Twitter


Thursday, 24 August 2017 | 15:26
Strongest Typhoon in Macau Kills 12 The most powerful typhoon to hit the southern Chinese region,
Macau, in more than half a century left at least 12 dead.
Thursday, 24 August 2017 | 15:14
Liverpool to Meet Leicester in Cup Eight - times winners Liverpool were paired with Leicester
City when the draw for the third round of the English League
Cup was made in Beijing.
In Ahok's Blasphemy Case, LBH Jakarta Defends Ahok  
ANTARA/Pool/Miftahulhaya
Sunday, 16 April, 2017 | 15:44 WIB
In Ahok's Blasphemy Case, LBH Jakarta Defends Ahok  

TEMPO.CO, Jakarta- Jakarta Legal Aid Institute (LBH) filed Amicus Curiae (a brief filed by someone who is not party to a case) in the blasphemy case against Basuki Tjahaja Purnama known as Ahok.

LBH Jakarta director Alghiffari Aqsa claimed that Ahok has fallen victim to the use of an anti-democracy article.

Alghiffari stated that the statement made by Basuki or Ahok in Pramuka island, Seribu Islands on September last year could not at all be considered as religious tafsir (interpretation).

"Ahok actually criticized a subject of law (people) or certain parties that use religious articles (Koran) to deceive the public in political activities," he said on Saturday (15/4).

Alghiffari explained that such a statement did not meet bad intent as required to be proven in line with Article 156a Criminal Code (KUHP). In this case, Ahok’s statement is protected by the freedom of speech and expression as stipulated by Article 28E of Law No.9/1998.

"It is the spread of negative interpretation in social media over Ahok’s statement that actually causes an uproar in the society," Alghiffari said.

He mentioned that there was a third party who interpreted Ahok’s statement. This third party did not even listen, witness, or directly experience the moment when the statement was uttered.

MAYA AYU PUSPITASARI

 



via Facebookvia TEMPO ID

Comments


Disclaimer: The views expressed in the comments sections are personal responses that do not represent the editorial policy of tempo.co. Our editorial staff reserves the right to moderate or take down comments that contain harassment, intimidation and discrimination against ethnicity, religion, race, and inter-group relations.