Lupa Kata Sandi? Klik di Sini

atau Masuk melalui

Belum Memiliki Akun Daftar di Sini


atau Daftar melalui

Sudah Memiliki Akun Masuk di Sini

Konfirmasi Email

Kami telah mengirimkan link aktivasi melalui email ke rudihamdani@gmail.com.

Klik link aktivasi dan dapatkan akses membaca 2 artikel gratis non Laput di koran dan Majalah Tempo

Jika Anda tidak menerima email,
Kirimkan Lagi Sekarang

Misguided Trial

Translator

Editor

31 August 2015 05:46 WIB

Canadian teacher Neil Bantleman (R), his lawyer Hotman Paris Hutapea (C), and Indonesian teacher Ferdinand Tjiong (L) raise their hands in front of the gate of Cipinang prison shortly after they released from prison in Jakarta, August 14, 2015. An Indonesian court will free two international school teachers who were jailed for sexually abusing students, the pair's lawyer and the brother of one the teachers said on Friday, in a case that critics say was fraught with irregularities. TEMPO/Subekti

TEMPO.CO, Jakarta - The inconsistent ruling of the trial in the alleged case of sexual abuse to students of Jakarta International School kindergarten -- now known as Jakarta Intercultural School (JIS) -- indicates that there is something wrong in the legal process.

To five JIS janitors who were named as suspects, the judges ruled that they were proven to have committed sexual violence and those janitors were sentenced to 7- 8 years in prison.

Afterwards, two weeks ago, a panel of judges at the appeal level at the Jakarta High Court freed two JIS teachers from the same charge.

In fact, both cases were based on the same evidence, namely medical examination.

The case began from a report filed by parent of one of the students of JIS kindergarten to the police, saying that their child was sexually molested at the school.

The police then made a fast move by detaining six janitors of the school and named them suspects.

In the investigation process, one of the suspects died and was said to have committed suicide.

Recently, the police have also named two JIS teachers Neill Bantleman and Ferdinant Tjong as suspects.

By using medical examination conducted at a number of hospitals and testimony of three children who became the victims and their parents, in April this year, the South Jakarta district court ruled that the two teachers were guilty and they were sentenced to 11 years in prison.

However, the high court then annulled the ruling made by the district court and declared that there was no strong evidence that sexual molestation was committed by the teachers.

The judges considered that the visum et repertum (medical examination) did not indicate any signs sexual violence. The judges also rejected the testimony of the witness who was still a minor.

The problem is, the same medical examination was also sued by the prosecutor to charge those JIS janitors.

For this case, up until the appeal level, the judges considered sexual molestation did happen, proven by the medial examination and testimony of the victims.

Certainly, every judge, at every level, every case, has authority and independence to interpret evidence and makes a ruling of a case.

However, different verdicts for two cases that are exactly similar with similar evidence clearly disturb our sense of justice.

Therefore, the prosecutor must bring the JIS teachers case to the appeal level.

To prevent this trial from becoming a misguided trial, at the appeal level the judge must weigh this case carefully.

For example, judges at the appeal level concluded that the medical examination did not prove that sexual violence was committed.

Is that a logical presumption?

Parent of the one of the victims said that according to the medical examination done at Pondok Indah hospital, in the rectum of their child they found blister, bleeding, and pus.

Also, the judges’ decision to ignore the testimony of the victims, is that a correct move?

In the legal practice, we recognize the principle of in dubio pro reo, that is if there is doubt whether the defendant is guilty or not, the judge must make a ruling that give benefits to the defendants.

It means that if at the appeal level – with serious efforts to prove the case — the judges remain in doubt the accusation made by the prosecutor to the two teachers, acquittal is already a correct move.

However, if that happens, then, for the sense of justice, the ruling to five JIS sanitary officers must be reviewed.

Besides, it is widely known that the testimony of the janitors to the police in the police interrogation report (BAP) that was used to incriminate them at the court was in fact made under torture.

(*)



Jokowi's Hand in the Golkar Party

2 jam lalu

Jokowi's Hand in the Golkar Party

Jokowi has ambitions to take control of the Golkar Party. It is his new way to stay relevant to those in power.


The Backers of Illegal Tin Mining

3 hari lalu

The Backers of Illegal Tin Mining

The Attorney General's Office is investigating alleged corruption over tin mining permits in Bangka Belitung.


The Importance of the Right of Inquiry

4 hari lalu

The Importance of the Right of Inquiry

Jokowi is taking Indonesia right back to the start of the Reformasi era. The right of inquiry could be a way to save democracy.


Funding for the Hasty Free Lunch Program

4 hari lalu

Funding for the Hasty Free Lunch Program

Jokowi and his ministers begin tinkering with the budget for the free lunch program. It is not appropriate and highly risky.


Empty Words about Nusantara Forest City

6 hari lalu

Empty Words about Nusantara Forest City

The claim that the Nusantara Capital City will be a sustainable forest city is just empty words from officials.


Minister Bahlil's Grease Money

11 hari lalu

Minister Bahlil's Grease Money

Investment Minister Bahlil Lahadalia has revoked mining permits and then reissued them. There are indications of illegal buying and selling of permits


The Grip of Corruption on Our Courts

11 hari lalu

The Grip of Corruption on Our Courts

Corruption is spreading through the Indonesian legal system. This is illustrated by the case involving the Supreme Court secretary.


Pretending to Reduce Emissions

13 hari lalu

Pretending to Reduce Emissions

The REDD+ program brought in money but failed to protect forests. Millions of hectares of forests become concession areas for mining corporations.


The Spread of Illegal Rice Levies

13 hari lalu

The Spread of Illegal Rice Levies

Illegal levies are worsening the shortages of subsidized rice. Price rises are caused by, among other things, corruption.


The Return of Meat Import Quotas

18 hari lalu

The Return of Meat Import Quotas

The government, once again, is applying a policy of import quotas. This will lead to collusion and bribery.