Lupa Kata Sandi? Klik di Sini

atau Masuk melalui

Belum Memiliki Akun Daftar di Sini


atau Daftar melalui

Sudah Memiliki Akun Masuk di Sini

Konfirmasi Email

Kami telah mengirimkan link aktivasi melalui email ke rudihamdani@gmail.com.

Klik link aktivasi dan dapatkan akses membaca 2 artikel gratis non Laput di koran dan Majalah Tempo

Jika Anda tidak menerima email,
Kirimkan Lagi Sekarang

The Recurring Topic of Asset Recovery Bill

Translator

TEMPO

Editor

Laila Afifa

14 February 2024 16:01 WIB

TEMPO.CO, JakartaDeliberations on the Asset Recovery Bill are again stalled at the DPR. The bill is turned into a political product during the campaign period.

ALTHOUGH the presidential candidates have stated their support for the Criminal Asset Recovery Bill, its legislation is nowhere in sight. Deliberations on the government-proposed bill have again reached a stalemate. The House of Representatives (DPR) did not mention the bill at all at the last plenary hearing on February 6.

The legislation process for the bill meant to seize the assets of criminals has gone slowly over the past nine months. President Joko Widodo sent a letter proposing the bill to House Speaker Puan Maharani on May 4, 2023. To this day, the letter has not left Puan’s desk. This bill does not seem to be a joint priority of the government and legislative body—unlike other government-proposed bills such as the Job Creation Bill and the Capital City Bill, which were legislated in a short time.

The Asset Recovery Bill had already been recommended by the Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center (PPATK) in 2008, during Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono’s administration. The government designed the first draft in 2012. After years of no progress, there was a second revision in 2019. The bill’s latest revision was made in 2023. Considering the time, the bill seems to be deliberated according to the season, i.e., during campaign periods.

Political party leaders have not instructed members to deliberate the bill. Based on Tempo’s investigation, politicians are unsettled by at least two articles, among others a section under Article 5, which outlines the criteria for criminal assets that can be seized despite having been donated, to include economic profits resulting from these assets. There is also Article 7, which states that a perpetrator’s assets can be seized although the person has died or escaped. All forfeiture can be performed without a criminalization process.

Politicians do not need to be allergic to the bill, if they truly support eliminating corruption, as all political parties have always advertised. The Asset Recovery Bill is needed because so far, law enforcers have been obstructed by the law when they wish to seize assets that have changed hands. The bill is expected to have a deterrent effect because it can impoverish those targeted, from corruptors to drug dealers.

During deliberations, the DPR can test these articles openly by inviting academicians, criminal law experts, as well as civil society organizations that have long monitored the bill’s progress. A joint discussion is important because the bill may have articles that can potentially lead to misuse of authority.

If misused, the bill can be used as a tool to legitimize and perpetuate oligarchy. Nowadays, it is easy for the government to bend the law. This phenomenon is evident in the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). The previously independent institution has transformed into an arm of the executive power after the revised KPK Law was passed. As a result, the commission has often been used to intimidate political rivals using corruption cases. The Asset Recovery Bill needs to regulate the authority of investigators. Law enforcers, for example, should only be able to seize corruptors’ assets through a court order. The institution appointed to manage seized assets must also be monitored by an independent agency.

No matter what, the first step is to make this bill a priority. If not, the topic will only be raised again five years from now, during yet another campaign period.

Read the Complete Story in Tempo English Magazine



Broadcasting Bill; Mahfud Md Says Investigative Journalism is Journalists' Job

21 jam lalu

Broadcasting Bill; Mahfud Md Says Investigative Journalism is Journalists' Job

Mahfud Md, former coordinating minister for politics, legal, and security Affairs, objected to the revision of Law No. 32 of 2002 on broadcasting.


Mismanaged Plastic Waste

23 jam lalu

Mismanaged Plastic Waste

Ten percent of Indonesian plastic waste ends up in the ocean. It is time for a total ban on single-use plastic.


DPR Starts Discussions on Revision of State Ministries Law

1 hari lalu

DPR Starts Discussions on Revision of State Ministries Law

The House of Representatives (DPR) has initiated discussions on the amendment of Law No. 39 of 2008 concerning State Ministries.


Press Council Opposes Broadcasting Bill

1 hari lalu

Press Council Opposes Broadcasting Bill

The Press Council and its constituents firmly oppose the broadcasting bill currently under deliberation in the Legislative Board of the House.


The Supreme Court's Lack of Ethics

1 hari lalu

The Supreme Court's Lack of Ethics

Alleged ethical violations by Supreme Court justices who were treated to a meal by an attorney underline the sorry state of our judicial system.


Sharing Out Ministerial Seats in a Big Cabinet

6 hari lalu

Sharing Out Ministerial Seats in a Big Cabinet

Prabowo Subianto intends to form a cabinet of 40 ministers. This will result in a bloated bureaucracy and wasted public money.


The Dark Threat of Surveillance Equipment

7 hari lalu

The Dark Threat of Surveillance Equipment

The surreptitious purchase of surveillance devices is a threat to democracy and people's rights to privacy. It is also prone to embezzlement and abuse


Jokowi Assures Regional Head Elections Set in November

7 hari lalu

Jokowi Assures Regional Head Elections Set in November

Jokowi ensures that the 2024 regional head elections would be held according to schedule.


The Warning of a Banking Crisis

7 hari lalu

The Warning of a Banking Crisis

The OJK releases a new regulation obliging banks to increase their capital.


The Wrong Energy Transition Approach

8 hari lalu

The Wrong Energy Transition Approach

The Ombilin PLTU in Sumatra, which is a threat to the environment and human health, is being addressed using a bogus energy transition solution.