Lupa Kata Sandi? Klik di Sini

atau Masuk melalui

Belum Memiliki Akun Daftar di Sini


atau Daftar melalui

Sudah Memiliki Akun Masuk di Sini

Konfirmasi Email

Kami telah mengirimkan link aktivasi melalui email ke rudihamdani@gmail.com.

Klik link aktivasi dan dapatkan akses membaca 2 artikel gratis non Laput di koran dan Majalah Tempo

Jika Anda tidak menerima email,
Kirimkan Lagi Sekarang

Subsidizing Political Parties

Translator

Editor

7 September 2017 13:28 WIB

TEMPO/Imam Yunni

TEMPO.CO, Jakarta - The government has approved an increase in state funding for political parties. This policy is aimed at preventing corruption among politicians and improving the quality of democracy. But these noble aims will not be achieved if party finances are not monitored.

State subsidies for parties started at Rp108 per vote garnered in elections, but have now risen to Rp1,000 per vote. This means that from next year, the government will pay out Rp124.9 billion to the parties with seats in the House of Representatives. This total does not include funding for parties in the provinces and regencies, which comes from regional budgets.

This tenfold increase is unwise. It should have been implemented in stages, given the poor state of the nation's finances. And the provision of funds should not only be based on electoral votes but also be linked to efforts to reform the parties.

Research carried out by the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance reported in Funding of Political Parties and Election Campaigns: A Handbook on Political Finance (2014) shows that subsidies do not affect the quality of parties. They are still controlled by and dependent on a group of rich business people. Greedy politicians are still corrupt and take advantage of weak reporting of party finances to launder money.

To avoid this kind of problem, the government needs to tighten up the provision of subsidies by imposing additional conditions such as the seriousness of parties in collecting membership fees. In accordance with the Political Parties Law, the sources of party funds are state grants, membership fees, and donations. But no party has yet managed to properly collect fees from its own members. Therefore, the main source of party funding has remained donations, even from the proceedings of corruption. There have been repeated revelations of party managers and treasurers being involved in corruption of government projects.

The commitment of parties to preventing and eradicating corruption could also be made a condition, especially since many senior party officials give the impression of inconsistency. They demand large subsidies prevent their members becoming corrupt, but then attack the Corruption Eradication Commission-a body that has such a vital role in fighting this crime.

Furthermore, the government needs to push the parties to reform their financial reporting. To make it easier to monitor the subsidies, the government should provide assistance not as a complete package, but for separate activities, such as for the cost of office administration, membership recruitment or the formation of cadres. The law obliges parties to provide the results of an audit in their annual financial reports, but only a few do this because there are no sanctions for not doing so.

More stringent rules are needed to accompany this increase in state funding for parties. Audits could be carried out by the Supreme Audit Agency, rather than by independent auditors as at present. Embezzlement of state subsidies by senior party officials should be seen as corruption. The reporting of funds from the public also needs to be put in order. Currently, the financial reports from the parties that do follow the rules, have been strange, to put it mildly. Party income, mostly from donations, is far less than the estimates of spending on party activities.

Without transparency of party finances, state subsidies will do nothing to improve the quality of democracy or to reduce corruption.

Read the full story in this week’s edition of Tempo English Magazine



Election Fraud in a Neighboring Country

14 jam lalu

Election Fraud in a Neighboring Country

Seven members of the Kuala Lumpur PPLN are proven to have inflated the number of voters for the 2024 elections.


Because the State Is Not an Entrepreneur

1 hari lalu

Because the State Is Not an Entrepreneur

The government plans to accelerate the privatization of state-owned enterprises. Stop paying out budget funds for state companies.


Ignoring the Rights of Indigenous People

2 hari lalu

Ignoring the Rights of Indigenous People

Indigenous people are taking legal action against the President and the DPR for delaying deliberations of a bill. It has taken second place to the int


BTN Syariah's Acquisition of Bank Muamalat

6 hari lalu

BTN Syariah's Acquisition of Bank Muamalat

The government is to combine BTN's Sharia business unit with Bank Muamalat. This could lead to problems.


Lackadaisical Disaster Mitigation

7 hari lalu

Lackadaisical Disaster Mitigation

Hydrometeorological disasters hit a number of areas in Indonesia. Ironically, mitigation efforts are not yet a priority.


Child Pornography Syndicate in Indonesia

8 hari lalu

Child Pornography Syndicate in Indonesia

The crime of child pornography is continuing to spread. Perpetrators can operate from inside the jail.


Jokowi's Hand in the Golkar Party

9 hari lalu

Jokowi's Hand in the Golkar Party

Jokowi has ambitions to take control of the Golkar Party. It is his new way to stay relevant to those in power.


The Backers of Illegal Tin Mining

12 hari lalu

The Backers of Illegal Tin Mining

The Attorney General's Office is investigating alleged corruption over tin mining permits in Bangka Belitung.


The Importance of the Right of Inquiry

13 hari lalu

The Importance of the Right of Inquiry

Jokowi is taking Indonesia right back to the start of the Reformasi era. The right of inquiry could be a way to save democracy.


Funding for the Hasty Free Lunch Program

14 hari lalu

Funding for the Hasty Free Lunch Program

Jokowi and his ministers begin tinkering with the budget for the free lunch program. It is not appropriate and highly risky.