Lupa Kata Sandi? Klik di Sini

atau Masuk melalui

Belum Memiliki Akun Daftar di Sini


atau Daftar melalui

Sudah Memiliki Akun Masuk di Sini

Konfirmasi Email

Kami telah mengirimkan link aktivasi melalui email ke rudihamdani@gmail.com.

Klik link aktivasi dan dapatkan akses membaca 2 artikel gratis non Laput di koran dan Majalah Tempo

Jika Anda tidak menerima email,
Kirimkan Lagi Sekarang

The More The Merrier

Translator

Editor

21 June 2017 07:06 WIB

TEMPO.CO, Jakarta - The House of Representatives (DPR) deliberations to change a threshold requirement for nominating presidential and vice-presidential candidates is just a waste of time. In 2013, the Constitutional Court decided the election of members of the legislature and the presidential election be held simultaneously, which automatically eliminates any need for a presidential threshold.

The DPR and the government need to obey this final and binding verdict. Forcing political parties to obtain a minimal vote count to field a presidential candidate in 2019 by using the results of the 2014 election is at odds with the logic of democracy. As we know, the political situation has changed much over the past five years.

The idea of limiting the number of candidates running in a presidential election is understandable. Having too many candidates not only confuses voters, but also leads to high-cost politics. However, this drive may not reduce the essence of democracy, including adhering to the Constitution.

To date, the debate over a threshold for presidential candidates as well as a parliamentary threshold for parties to be eligible for the DPR has not been based on the substance of democracy. DPR members are more concerned with their respective short-term interests. This is why they change the rules every time a general election rolls around. Any changes often marked by gerrymandering or manipulation of the rules to benefit certain parties.

The reasons put forward for a presidential threshold are seemingly noble: setting a high threshold will create a stable government. A coalition of parties supporting a candidate will support the elected president for the length of their term. However, in reality, we all witness how members of political parties belonging to the government coalition, often act more like opposition. In the end, that promised stability never comes.

The Presidential Election Law currently being written by the House and the administration should provide an opportunity to all political parties taking part in the election to field pairs of candidates. In addition to adhering to the verdict of the Constitutional Court, this system would create congruity between the campaign promises of candidates and their supporting parties. The logic is that the parties which supported the winning presidential candidate will also receive the same large number of votes in legislative elections.

The filter for determining the number of candidates is already available: verification of the political parties taking part in elections. The regulations which must be met by parties wishing to participate are quite rigorous. They must have, among other things, party offices and officials in most regions of the country. In the 2014 election, only 10 of the more than 40 registered parties passed the verification stage. This number grew to 12 when two parties won lawsuits in court.

Verification of political parties taking part in elections should be sufficient to limit the number of presidential candidates when elections are held simultaneously. The DPR does not need to set thresholds for nominations, which is in violation of a Constitutional Court verdict.(*)

Read the full story in this week’s edition of Tempo English Magazine



Election Fraud in a Neighboring Country

8 jam lalu

Election Fraud in a Neighboring Country

Seven members of the Kuala Lumpur PPLN are proven to have inflated the number of voters for the 2024 elections.


Because the State Is Not an Entrepreneur

1 hari lalu

Because the State Is Not an Entrepreneur

The government plans to accelerate the privatization of state-owned enterprises. Stop paying out budget funds for state companies.


Ignoring the Rights of Indigenous People

2 hari lalu

Ignoring the Rights of Indigenous People

Indigenous people are taking legal action against the President and the DPR for delaying deliberations of a bill. It has taken second place to the int


BTN Syariah's Acquisition of Bank Muamalat

6 hari lalu

BTN Syariah's Acquisition of Bank Muamalat

The government is to combine BTN's Sharia business unit with Bank Muamalat. This could lead to problems.


Lackadaisical Disaster Mitigation

7 hari lalu

Lackadaisical Disaster Mitigation

Hydrometeorological disasters hit a number of areas in Indonesia. Ironically, mitigation efforts are not yet a priority.


Child Pornography Syndicate in Indonesia

8 hari lalu

Child Pornography Syndicate in Indonesia

The crime of child pornography is continuing to spread. Perpetrators can operate from inside the jail.


Jokowi's Hand in the Golkar Party

9 hari lalu

Jokowi's Hand in the Golkar Party

Jokowi has ambitions to take control of the Golkar Party. It is his new way to stay relevant to those in power.


The Backers of Illegal Tin Mining

12 hari lalu

The Backers of Illegal Tin Mining

The Attorney General's Office is investigating alleged corruption over tin mining permits in Bangka Belitung.


The Importance of the Right of Inquiry

13 hari lalu

The Importance of the Right of Inquiry

Jokowi is taking Indonesia right back to the start of the Reformasi era. The right of inquiry could be a way to save democracy.


Funding for the Hasty Free Lunch Program

14 hari lalu

Funding for the Hasty Free Lunch Program

Jokowi and his ministers begin tinkering with the budget for the free lunch program. It is not appropriate and highly risky.