Lupa Kata Sandi? Klik di Sini

atau Masuk melalui

Belum Memiliki Akun Daftar di Sini


atau Daftar melalui

Sudah Memiliki Akun Masuk di Sini

Konfirmasi Email

Kami telah mengirimkan link aktivasi melalui email ke rudihamdani@gmail.com.

Klik link aktivasi dan dapatkan akses membaca 2 artikel gratis non Laput di koran dan Majalah Tempo

Jika Anda tidak menerima email,
Kirimkan Lagi Sekarang

The Problem with Life time Judges

Translator

Editor

8 December 2016 17:34 WIB

PHOTO: legaljuice.com

TEMPO.CO, Jakarta - The petition to remove limits on Constitutional Court judges's terms of office is absurd. The arguments used to support the proposal are weak. In fact, the drawback of appointing judges for life is considerable: it could lead to judges abusing their powers.

The weakness of the argument is apparent from the petition proposed by the University of Indonesia Center for the Study of Strategic Issues. This is the body that asked for a reexamination of Article 22 of Law No. 24/2003 on the Constitutional Court. This article, which limits the term of office of constitutional judges to two periods, or five years, is viewed as conflicting with the Constitution.

However, the Center has been unable to show exactly how it goes against the 1945 Constitution. The problem is that Article 24 of the Constitution, which is the basis for the petition, only covers general matters, namely an independent court system. Meanwhile, Article 24-C leaves the dismissal and appointment of constitutional judges to the law.

The reason given for the petition, that lifetime appointments would make constitutional judges more independent, is very strange. The independence of the judges would be more under threat. These judges would be prone to infiltration of interests from outsiders and to political interests, but they would not be able to be corrected or replaced until they died.

The excuse that limits on terms are discriminating is also misplaced. There are terms of office for constitutional judges, namely a term of five years which can be renewed once. But it is wrong to say that the terms of other judges are unlimited. Judges in criminal courts can only work until they retire, not for their entire lives.

There is a huge risk that if the Constitutional Court grants this petition, the judges will be free of any control. However, they have extraordinary powers to test all laws and rule on disputes over the authority of state institutions, including deciding on the dismissal of the president.

The actions of the Constitutional Court appear to be rather arbitrary. Since its establishment in 2003, it has passed many controversial rulings that have triggered public criticism, leading to observations that some of its rulings do not support efforts to eradicate corruption. The Court has reduced the powers of the Judicial Commission to such an extent, that now it can only select Supreme Court judges. The image of the court was dealt a severe blow when Constitutional Court Chairman Akil Mochtar was detained by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) a few years ago.

If the image of the Court is to be restored, the judges should reject this petition for a review. The term limits for constitutional judges is a good thing. There would still be a mechanism to control them. If they perform well, they can be selected to serve another term, but if they do badly, they can be dismissed.

It would be very dangerous if there were no limits on the constitutional judges' terms of office. Let the House of Representatives (DPR) consider and decide on this matter. As it happens, the revisions to the Constitutional Court Law are listed in the agenda of the DPR's legislation body. 

It would be unseemly for the constitutional judges to rule on a matter that concerns their own interests. If this were to happen, it would show even more clearly an unethical and arbitrary stance. (*)

Read the full story in this week's edition of Tempo English Magazine



Because the State Is Not an Entrepreneur

23 jam lalu

Because the State Is Not an Entrepreneur

The government plans to accelerate the privatization of state-owned enterprises. Stop paying out budget funds for state companies.


Ignoring the Rights of Indigenous People

2 hari lalu

Ignoring the Rights of Indigenous People

Indigenous people are taking legal action against the President and the DPR for delaying deliberations of a bill. It has taken second place to the int


BTN Syariah's Acquisition of Bank Muamalat

6 hari lalu

BTN Syariah's Acquisition of Bank Muamalat

The government is to combine BTN's Sharia business unit with Bank Muamalat. This could lead to problems.


Lackadaisical Disaster Mitigation

7 hari lalu

Lackadaisical Disaster Mitigation

Hydrometeorological disasters hit a number of areas in Indonesia. Ironically, mitigation efforts are not yet a priority.


Child Pornography Syndicate in Indonesia

7 hari lalu

Child Pornography Syndicate in Indonesia

The crime of child pornography is continuing to spread. Perpetrators can operate from inside the jail.


Jokowi's Hand in the Golkar Party

9 hari lalu

Jokowi's Hand in the Golkar Party

Jokowi has ambitions to take control of the Golkar Party. It is his new way to stay relevant to those in power.


The Backers of Illegal Tin Mining

12 hari lalu

The Backers of Illegal Tin Mining

The Attorney General's Office is investigating alleged corruption over tin mining permits in Bangka Belitung.


The Importance of the Right of Inquiry

13 hari lalu

The Importance of the Right of Inquiry

Jokowi is taking Indonesia right back to the start of the Reformasi era. The right of inquiry could be a way to save democracy.


Funding for the Hasty Free Lunch Program

13 hari lalu

Funding for the Hasty Free Lunch Program

Jokowi and his ministers begin tinkering with the budget for the free lunch program. It is not appropriate and highly risky.


Empty Words about Nusantara Forest City

15 hari lalu

Empty Words about Nusantara Forest City

The claim that the Nusantara Capital City will be a sustainable forest city is just empty words from officials.