Lupa Kata Sandi? Klik di Sini

atau Masuk melalui

Belum Memiliki Akun Daftar di Sini


atau Daftar melalui

Sudah Memiliki Akun Masuk di Sini

Konfirmasi Email

Kami telah mengirimkan link aktivasi melalui email ke rudihamdani@gmail.com.

Klik link aktivasi dan dapatkan akses membaca 2 artikel gratis non Laput di koran dan Majalah Tempo

Jika Anda tidak menerima email,
Kirimkan Lagi Sekarang

Controversy of 1965 Incident

Translator

Editor

25 July 2016 05:26 WIB

The judges of the 1965 International People`s Tribunal (IPT) in The Hague, Netherlands. TEMPO/Purwani Diyah Prabandari

TEMPO.CO, Jakarta - The government should not underestimate the results of the International People's Tribunal (IPT) on the events of 1965.


It would be in vain to react strongly against the decision of the Court of the International Community, because it will only further tarnish Indonesia’s image.


The IPT began its hearings in November 2015 and made a decision on Wednesday last week on the alleged human rights violations by the state during the period of 1965 to 1966.


The court declared that genocide had occurred in the eradication of supporters and members of the Indonesian Communist Party in 1965 and 1966.


The IPT also recommend the Indonesian government to apologize for the incident and to carry out an investigation.


The strong reaction was immediately shown by Defense Minister Ryamizard Ryacudu, who considered the trial as a sham and aims to divide the Indonesian people.


In the meantime, Coordinating Minister for Political, Legal and Security Luhut Binsar Pandjaitan rejected that mass murder had occurred.


The IPT is not an official institution; however recommendation of this tribunal is quite influential.


The same court ever prosecutes Israeli crimes against the Palestinian people, which ended with recognition of the world.


Moreover, the conclusion that genocide took place in 1965 in a not a groundless allegation.


The government has insisted that massacres in 1965 and 1966 constitute a conflict of horizontal, rather than a vertical  conflict which involves the state, so the state does not need to apologize to the victims.


However, numerous evidence, including the results of the investigation the Commission in 2012, shows the presence of state interference in violence committed in various parts of the country.


Hundreds of thousands of people were killed and tens of thousands of people imprisoned for a dozen years without trial.


Signs of change was shown by President Jokowi during his speech in front of the Parliament on August 14, 2015 by claiming the government was trying to find a way out of the wisest and most noble way to resolve cases of human rights violations in the country, including reconciliation.


Governor of the National Resilience Institute Agus Widjojo and member of the Presidential Advisory Council, Sidarto Danusubroto, also held the symposium "Membedah Tragedi 1965" in April this year.


If the government is serious, there are two steps that that they can take related to the events in 1965 and 1966.


First, through legal channels. The results of the investigation done by the National Commission of Human Rights (Komnas HAM), which recommended the investigation, could be followed by Attorney General Office.


The second step is the non-judicial way by achieving reconciliation after the acknowledgment that gross human rights violations involving the state has been committed.


But both measures are still difficult to expect.


Even now, a number of officials rejected the result of tribunal in The Hague.


The government should respect the ruling of the IPT and attempt to settle the cases in 1965 and 1966 in a fair and dignified way.



(*)






The Corrupt Design in Lobster Downstreaming

13 jam lalu

The Corrupt Design in Lobster Downstreaming

The Ministry of Fisheries produced some strange regulations about the cultivation and export of lobsters.


Legal Tinkering to Pay Political Debt

5 hari lalu

Legal Tinkering to Pay Political Debt

President Jokowi is planning to grant mining concessions to mass organizations. Paying political debts.


Questioning Modern Spiritual Slavery

5 hari lalu

Questioning Modern Spiritual Slavery

Deifying habib is a characteristic of inferior mentality and religious feudalism. It has been cultivated since colonial times.


For the Sake of Educational Standards in Pesantren

6 hari lalu

For the Sake of Educational Standards in Pesantren

Many Islamic boarding schools (pesantren) are operating without permits. There needs to be standardization of these religious educational institutions


Evidence of Human Rights Violations at Rumoh Geudong

7 hari lalu

Evidence of Human Rights Violations at Rumoh Geudong

The human remains at Rumoh Geudong are strong evidence of human rights violations. The government has an obligation to uncover the truth.


The High Price of Our Legislative Seats

7 hari lalu

The High Price of Our Legislative Seats

Prospective legislators need to spend large amounts of money to garner votes in increasingly transactional elections. A simpler system is needed.


End the Military Exemption from Climate Mitigation

8 hari lalu

End the Military Exemption from Climate Mitigation

Emissions from conflicts and the military sector damage the environment. This is often ignored because of global political pressures.


Spreading the Virus of Debt to the Provinces

8 hari lalu

Spreading the Virus of Debt to the Provinces

There is a major risk to the issuing of regional bonds at the provincial level. Threats come from low fiscal capacity and poor management.


The Mistaken Ban on Independent Umrah Pilgrimages

15 hari lalu

The Mistaken Ban on Independent Umrah Pilgrimages

The government ban on independent umrah only benefits travel agents. The government of Saudi Arabia already made it easy for everyone to perform umrah


Restoring the Dignity of the Constitutional Court

19 hari lalu

Restoring the Dignity of the Constitutional Court

Anies and Ganjar, along with their campaign teams, are asking the Constitutional Court to annul the victory of Prabowo and Gibran.