Lupa Kata Sandi? Klik di Sini

atau Masuk melalui

Belum Memiliki Akun Daftar di Sini


atau Daftar melalui

Sudah Memiliki Akun Masuk di Sini

Konfirmasi Email

Kami telah mengirimkan link aktivasi melalui email ke rudihamdani@gmail.com.

Klik link aktivasi dan dapatkan akses membaca 2 artikel gratis non Laput di koran dan Majalah Tempo

Jika Anda tidak menerima email,
Kirimkan Lagi Sekarang

Stamping Out Independent Candidates

Translator

Editor

28 April 2016 10:08 WIB

TEMPO.CO, Jakarta - There have been many and varied efforts to make it difficult for independent candidates to stand in regional elections. This antidemocratic endeavor began with the House of Representatives' (DPR) government commission proposing an increase in the number of statements of support needed for nomination. 

Subsequently, the General Elections Commission (KPU) came up with the idea to require a duty stamp (meterai) to be attached to each letter of support for independent candidates. This seemingly contrived requirement has been included in the draft revision to KPU Regulation No. 9/2015 on Nominations for Elections of Regional Heads. It is easy to imagine the inconvenience this will cause if it obliges the use of a duty stamp on individual statements of support or those collected at the subdistrict level.

It is obvious that this is an effort to put obstacles in the way of independent candidates. Why? The Regional Elections Law clearly states that all that needs to be attached to a statement of support is a photocopy of an electronic ID card, a family card, a passport or another form of legally recognized ID.

This highly inconvenient new regulation clearly creates problems for the supporters of independent candidates. Just imagine: A duty stamp will have to be attached to every single statement of support for independent candidates. If this does become law, Rp6 billion would need to be found just in Jakarta for each independent candidate pair, or half of that total to meet the minimum requirement for the number of supporters in Jakarta. Basuki Tjahaja Purnama, who plans to stand as an independent in the Jakarta gubernatorial poll, was not wrong when he said that this new rule could bankrupt independent candidates.

The KPU, which seemed to take notice of public objections, then revised this requirement and now plans to only require the use of duty stamps on documents proving support at the subdistrict or village level. This still does not explain why duty stamps are needed on these collective documents. What is clear is that this rule will cause problems for independent candidates who have begun the process of seeking support by collecting copies of ID cards from the public. They will have to start the documentation process all over again.

This KPU regulation is also not right in terms of the function and aims of the duty stamps. Law No. 13/1985 on Duty Stamps states that they represent a tax document charged by the state for contracts or other documents used as evidence of an act in civil law. According to this law, a document or agreement without a duty stamp is automatically invalid.

The obligation to use a duty stamp is even stranger if we look at the stages that independent candidates have to go through. Statements of support with accompanying ID cards are verified administratively and factually. This means that all the data are handed over and checked by the KPU. Then the data are checked factually by visiting each and every supporter one by one. There is hardly any way of falsifying statements of support. So why inconvenience candidates with the requirement for a duty stamp?

Before the regulation is passed, the KPU should remove the clause requiring duty stamps. It must guarantee the right of every citizen to stand for election, including via the non-party route. This is important to avoid giving the impression that the KPU is carrying out secret orders from the parties to obstruct independent candidates. (*)

Read the full story in this week's edition of Tempo English Magazine



The Backers of Illegal Tin Mining

3 hari lalu

The Backers of Illegal Tin Mining

The Attorney General's Office is investigating alleged corruption over tin mining permits in Bangka Belitung.


The Importance of the Right of Inquiry

4 hari lalu

The Importance of the Right of Inquiry

Jokowi is taking Indonesia right back to the start of the Reformasi era. The right of inquiry could be a way to save democracy.


Funding for the Hasty Free Lunch Program

4 hari lalu

Funding for the Hasty Free Lunch Program

Jokowi and his ministers begin tinkering with the budget for the free lunch program. It is not appropriate and highly risky.


Empty Words about Nusantara Forest City

5 hari lalu

Empty Words about Nusantara Forest City

The claim that the Nusantara Capital City will be a sustainable forest city is just empty words from officials.


Minister Bahlil's Grease Money

11 hari lalu

Minister Bahlil's Grease Money

Investment Minister Bahlil Lahadalia has revoked mining permits and then reissued them. There are indications of illegal buying and selling of permits


The Grip of Corruption on Our Courts

11 hari lalu

The Grip of Corruption on Our Courts

Corruption is spreading through the Indonesian legal system. This is illustrated by the case involving the Supreme Court secretary.


Pretending to Reduce Emissions

12 hari lalu

Pretending to Reduce Emissions

The REDD+ program brought in money but failed to protect forests. Millions of hectares of forests become concession areas for mining corporations.


The Spread of Illegal Rice Levies

13 hari lalu

The Spread of Illegal Rice Levies

Illegal levies are worsening the shortages of subsidized rice. Price rises are caused by, among other things, corruption.


The Return of Meat Import Quotas

18 hari lalu

The Return of Meat Import Quotas

The government, once again, is applying a policy of import quotas. This will lead to collusion and bribery.


Disarray over Mangrove Protection

18 hari lalu

Disarray over Mangrove Protection

The government is not serious about protecting mangroves. The proposed mangrove protection regulation is only a meaningless gimmick.