Lupa Kata Sandi? Klik di Sini

atau Masuk melalui

Belum Memiliki Akun Daftar di Sini


atau Daftar melalui

Sudah Memiliki Akun Masuk di Sini

Konfirmasi Email

Kami telah mengirimkan link aktivasi melalui email ke rudihamdani@gmail.com.

Klik link aktivasi dan dapatkan akses membaca 2 artikel gratis non Laput di koran dan Majalah Tempo

Jika Anda tidak menerima email,
Kirimkan Lagi Sekarang

Power Dressing

Translator

Editor

18 September 2014 05:26 WIB

House Members of 2009-2014 period at Nusantara Building, Parliament Complex, Senayan, Jakarta, August 15, 2014.

TEMPO.CO, Jakarta - Towards the end of the House of Representatives' (DPR) five-year term, the legislators are creating one big controversy. People are protesting over the Local Elections (Pilkada) Bill, which seeks to return the local election system to the old one by which local chief executives would be selected by the regional councils (DPRD).


Even though the legislation is still in the planning stage, the conflict between the two groups in the DPR indicates the rivalry between the Red and White Coalition against the parties led by the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P) has not ended. The Red and White Coalition wants elections via the DPRD while the 'other side' want to retain direct elections of local leaders. It is, moreover, clear that the Pilkada Bill was launched because of the need to dominate power, not to comply with the people's wishes. 


Since direct elections began in 2005, people have seen many positive results. It was this system that voted in figures like Joko Widodo, Basuki Tjahaja Purnama, Rismaharini and Ridwan Kamil. The public measures the success of direct elections by the steps taken by the elected officials whom they regard as clean, modest and hard-working. Direct elections enabled Jokowi's meteoric rise from mayor of Solo to Jakarta governor and now, to the nation's top job.


Undoubtedly, there are some negative sides to direct elections which must be noted. First, it creates corruption. Direct local elections opens the door to vote-buying. Second, after the elections are over, the consequent disputes flood the Constitutional Court, which we found out corrupted its chief justice, Akil Mochtar. Third, in many places, every time an election took place, violence and protests always followed it because of the uncertain results. Fourth, but not least of the argument, with direct elections, Indonesian political life is seen as unhealthy because parliament, as the principal instrument in a democratic life, is rendered unimportant.


In reality, those shortcomings can be overcome by amendments, not by revising the decade-old system. The direct election system was introduced specifically to minimize vote-buying. If this effort has not succeeded, it's most likely because the rules have not been effective. Besides tightening the regulations the direct elections system must go together with the law enforcers' courage to act against those who break the law.


In addition, the DPR's (or the DPRD) position as pillars of democracy must be strengthened by the legislators themselves. If the people cannot trust their own representatives, there must be a reason. From the media, it is now clear that some parliamentarians are corrupt, sleep during sessions or act as servants of political parties and not as the people's representatives.


Not surprisingly, people reject local elections through the DPRD, because it means eliminating the people's right to vote, which would make the DPRD super-powerful. This is certainly not an excessive concern. The fact is that such a system will cause regents or governors to bow to the DPRD instead of to the people it is supposed to represent.


The over-arching goal to pass this Pilkada Bill is not because of the shortcomings in the direct elections system, but because it is a political maneuver of the coalition which lost in the recent presidential election and which now attempts to seek another way to control the regions. This political manuever should be seen as a clear and present danger. (*)



Election Fraud in a Neighboring Country

4 jam lalu

Election Fraud in a Neighboring Country

Seven members of the Kuala Lumpur PPLN are proven to have inflated the number of voters for the 2024 elections.


Because the State Is Not an Entrepreneur

1 hari lalu

Because the State Is Not an Entrepreneur

The government plans to accelerate the privatization of state-owned enterprises. Stop paying out budget funds for state companies.


Ignoring the Rights of Indigenous People

2 hari lalu

Ignoring the Rights of Indigenous People

Indigenous people are taking legal action against the President and the DPR for delaying deliberations of a bill. It has taken second place to the int


BTN Syariah's Acquisition of Bank Muamalat

6 hari lalu

BTN Syariah's Acquisition of Bank Muamalat

The government is to combine BTN's Sharia business unit with Bank Muamalat. This could lead to problems.


Lackadaisical Disaster Mitigation

7 hari lalu

Lackadaisical Disaster Mitigation

Hydrometeorological disasters hit a number of areas in Indonesia. Ironically, mitigation efforts are not yet a priority.


Child Pornography Syndicate in Indonesia

8 hari lalu

Child Pornography Syndicate in Indonesia

The crime of child pornography is continuing to spread. Perpetrators can operate from inside the jail.


Jokowi's Hand in the Golkar Party

9 hari lalu

Jokowi's Hand in the Golkar Party

Jokowi has ambitions to take control of the Golkar Party. It is his new way to stay relevant to those in power.


The Backers of Illegal Tin Mining

12 hari lalu

The Backers of Illegal Tin Mining

The Attorney General's Office is investigating alleged corruption over tin mining permits in Bangka Belitung.


The Importance of the Right of Inquiry

13 hari lalu

The Importance of the Right of Inquiry

Jokowi is taking Indonesia right back to the start of the Reformasi era. The right of inquiry could be a way to save democracy.


Funding for the Hasty Free Lunch Program

14 hari lalu

Funding for the Hasty Free Lunch Program

Jokowi and his ministers begin tinkering with the budget for the free lunch program. It is not appropriate and highly risky.